I’ve noticed these motifs coming up again and again in reviews of this book and in comments opposing critiques of it (such as my own): Fallacy #1: Lawler’s Temperament: Phil Lawler is a mid-mannered, temperate, easy-going, moderate, non-fanatical, non-extremist, measured, deliberate, objective, non-reactionary, scholarly person. Example: Dr. Samuel Gregg (The Catholic World Report, 3-2-18): The power […]
from
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2018/03/merits-of-phil-lawlers-lost-shepherd-three-common-fallacies.html
No comments:
Post a Comment